Today's post from meassociation.org.uk (see link below) discusses whether Amitriptyline actually works in reducing neuropathic pain and comes to some worrying conclusions, at least from the patient's point of view. Amitriptyline is one of the first ports of call for doctors prescribing medication for neuropathy and has been for decades and it has to be said that many people seem to benefit from it. However, the tests and studies shown here seem to indicate that it has little effect in reality. Remember, Amitriptyline is an anti-depressant so it may be logical that some neuropathy patients feel better having taken it, especially if the stress of the disease has caused them to be depressed, or their muscles and joints to reflect their stress. It's something you really need to discuss with your doctor and make sure you are convinced by his or her arguments for taking it. Amitriptyline is by no means the only treatment for neuropathy that is surrounded by controversy and dispute. More posts on the subject can be found by looking in the alphabetical list to the right of the blog.
TGI Friday! Our weekly round-up of recently published research study abstracts and newsby Tony Britton on December 21, 2012
From Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12 December 2012.Amitriptyline for neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults.
Moore RA, Derry S, Aldington D, Cole P, Wiffen PJ.
Pain Research and Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Pain Research Unit, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK, OX3 7LE.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Amitriptyline is a tricyclic antidepressant that is widely used to treat chronic neuropathic pain (pain due to nerve damage) and fibromyalgia, and is recommended in many guidelines. These types of pain can be treated with antidepressant drugs in doses below those at which the drugs act as antidepressants.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the analgesic efficacy of amitriptyline for chronic neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia.To assess the adverse events associated with the clinical use of amitriptyline for chronic neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE to September 2012, together with reference lists of retrieved papers, previous systematic reviews, and other reviews; we also used our own handsearched database for older studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised, double-blind studies of at least four weeks’ duration comparing amitriptyline with placebo or another active treatment in chronic neuropathic pain or fibromyalgia.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We extracted efficacy and adverse event data, and two study authors examined issues of study quality independently. We performed analysis using two tiers of evidence. The first tier used data meeting current best standards, where studies reported the outcome of at least 50% pain intensity reduction over baseline (or its equivalent), without the use of last observation carried forward (LOCF) or other imputation method for dropouts, reported an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, lasted 8 to 12 weeks or longer, had a parallel-group design, and where there were at least 200 participants in the comparison. The second tier used data that failed to meet this standard and were therefore subject to potential bias.
MAIN RESULTS
Twenty-one studies (1437 participants) were included; they individually involved between 15 and 235 participants, only four involved over 100 participants, and the median study size was 44 participants. The median duration was six weeks. Ten studies had a cross-over design.
Doses of amitriptyline were generally between 25 mg and 125 mg, and dose escalation was common.There was no top-tier evidence for amitriptyline in treating neuropathic pain or fibromyalgia. Second-tier evidence indicated no evidence of effect in cancer-related neuropathic pain or HIV-related neuropathic pain, but some evidence of effect in painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN), mixed neuropathic pain, and fibromyalgia.
Combining the classic neuropathic pain conditions of PDN, postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) and post-stroke pain with fibromyalgia for second-tier evidence, in eight studies and 687 participants, there was a statistically significant benefit (risk ratio (RR) 2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8 to 3.1) with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 4.6 (3.6 to 6.6).
The analysis showed that even using this potentially biased data, only about 38% of participants benefited with amitriptyline and 16% with placebo; most participants did not get adequate pain relief.
Potential benefits of amitriptyline were supported by a lower rate of lack of efficacy withdrawals; 8 out of 153 (5%) withdrew because of lack of efficacy with amitriptyline and 14 out of 119 (12%) with placebo. More participants experienced at least one adverse event; 64% of participants taking amitriptyline and 40% taking placebo. The RR was 1.5 (95% CI 1.4 to 1.7) and the number needed to treat to harm was 4.1 (95% CI 3.2 to 5.7). Adverse event and all-cause withdrawals were not different.
AUTHORS’ CONCLUSIONS
Amitriptyline has been a first-line treatment for neuropathic pain for many years. The fact that there is no supportive unbiased evidence for a beneficial effect is disappointing, but has to be balanced against decades of successful treatment in many patients with neuropathic pain or fibromyalgia.
There is no good evidence of a lack of effect; rather our concern should be of overestimation of treatment effect. Amitriptyline should continue to be used as part of the treatment of neuropathic pain or fibromyalgia, but only a minority of patients will achieve satisfactory pain relief. Limited information suggests that failure with one antidepressant does not mean failure with all.It is unlikely that any large randomised trials of amitriptyline will be conducted in specific neuropathic pain conditions or in fibromyalgia to prove efficacy.
MEA note
Our medical adviser, Dr Charles Shepherd, comments: Low dose amitriptyline, along with some other sedating tricyclic drugs, is one of the commonest drugs to be prescribed for the relief of moderate to severe pain in ME/CFS, especially where this has a neuropathic quality, that has not responded to other types of treatment. Some people with ME/CFS gain considerable benefit whereas others fail to do so and/or experience a range of side-effects. The MEA has an information leaflet on amitriptyline.
From Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 11 December 2012
Sleep Abnormalities in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis: A Review
Melinda L. Jackson, Ph.D.; Dorothy Bruck, Ph.D.
School of Social Sciences and Psychology, Victoria University, Victoria, Australia
http://www.meassociation.org.uk/?p=13975
